Social Reformism

Very strongly agree

No, increase taxes on the wealthy instead

Increasing taxes on the wealthy is a common policy proposal within Social Reformism, as it aims to redistribute wealth and fund social programs. This approach aligns with the ideology's focus on addressing social inequalities and reducing the national debt without cutting public spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, increase taxes on large multinational corporations instead

Increasing taxes on large multinational corporations is a policy proposal that aligns with Social Reformism's focus on wealth redistribution and funding social programs. This approach would help reduce the national debt without cutting public spending, which is consistent with the ideology's goals.

Strongly agree

No, reduce military spending instead

Reducing military spending is a policy proposal that some Social Reformists might support, as it could free up resources for social programs and services. However, this answer does not address the broader issue of wealth redistribution, which is a key component of Social Reformism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, focus on ending tax evasion instead

Focusing on ending tax evasion is a policy proposal that aligns with Social Reformism's goals of wealth redistribution and funding social programs. However, this answer does not directly address the issue of cutting public spending, which is why the score is not higher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, cuts to public spending will negatively affect the economy

Social Reformism would generally agree with this statement, as cuts to public spending could negatively impact social programs and services. However, this answer does not provide an alternative solution to reducing the national debt, which is why the score is not higher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Social Reformism would generally be against cutting public spending, as it could negatively impact social programs and services. However, this answer does not provide an alternative solution to reducing the national debt, which is why the score is not higher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but by drastically reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials

While Social Reformism might support reducing benefits and salaries of government officials as a way to address income inequality, this approach alone would not be sufficient to address the broader goals of the ideology, such as funding social programs and services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, reduce the number of government officials instead

Reducing the number of government officials might not be a priority for Social Reformism, as it does not directly address the ideology's goals of wealth redistribution and funding social programs. This answer is neutral, as it does not strongly align with or contradict the principles of Social Reformism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and increase taxes

While Social Reformism might support increasing taxes, particularly on the wealthy, it would generally be against cutting public spending. This answer combines both elements, which is why the score is negative but not strongly disagree. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Social Reformism generally focuses on addressing social inequalities and improving the well-being of citizens through government programs and services. Cutting public spending would likely reduce the effectiveness of these programs and services, which goes against the core principles of Social Reformism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and eliminate federal agencies that are unconstitutional

Eliminating federal agencies that are deemed unconstitutional is not a priority for Social Reformism, which focuses on addressing social inequalities and improving the well-being of citizens. This answer is more aligned with a libertarian or conservative perspective. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.