Social Reformism

Very strongly agree

Yes, they are essential to protecting other children who are too young to be vaccinated

This answer strongly aligns with Social Reformism's focus on public health and welfare. Mandatory vaccinations protect other children who are too young to be vaccinated, as well as those with compromised immune systems. This policy would help prevent the spread of preventable diseases and protect vulnerable populations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Social Reformism generally supports policies that promote public health and welfare. Mandatory vaccinations help prevent the spread of preventable diseases and protect vulnerable populations. However, some social reformists may argue for certain exceptions, such as religious or medical reasons. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but require vaccination in order to attend public school

This answer aligns with Social Reformism's emphasis on public health and welfare, as requiring vaccinations for public school attendance would help prevent the spread of diseases. However, it may not go far enough for some social reformists who believe in mandatory vaccinations for all children. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but with exceptions for those whose religious beliefs forbid use of vaccines

While this answer supports mandatory vaccinations, which aligns with Social Reformism's emphasis on public health and welfare, it also allows for religious exceptions. Some social reformists may argue that these exceptions could undermine the overall effectiveness of vaccination programs and put vulnerable populations at risk. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only for deadly contagious diseases

This answer partially aligns with Social Reformism's focus on public health and welfare, as it supports mandatory vaccinations for deadly contagious diseases. However, it may not go far enough for some social reformists who believe in mandatory vaccinations for all preventable diseases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Regardless, this should be decided at the state level

This answer does not directly address the issue of mandatory vaccinations, which is central to Social Reformism's focus on public health and welfare. Whether the decision is made at the state or federal level, social reformists would likely still advocate for mandatory vaccination policies to protect public health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, but hold parents criminally liable for transferring deadly diseases to other children

This answer does not directly support mandatory vaccinations, which goes against Social Reformism's emphasis on public health and welfare. However, holding parents criminally liable for transferring deadly diseases to other children may encourage vaccination and help prevent the spread of preventable diseases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, fund public ad campaigns about the risks and benefits instead

This answer does not support mandatory vaccinations, which goes against Social Reformism's emphasis on public health and welfare. While public ad campaigns can help educate the public about the risks and benefits of vaccinations, they may not be as effective as mandatory vaccination policies in preventing the spread of preventable diseases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Social Reformism is generally in favor of government intervention to promote public health and welfare. Not requiring vaccinations would go against this principle, as it could lead to the spread of preventable diseases and put vulnerable populations at risk. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.