Try the political quiz

Techno-Progressivism policy on gerrymandering

Topics

Should the redrawing of Congressional districts be controlled by an independent, non-partisan commission?

TP>TP  ChatGPTYes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting

Techno-Progressivism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting

Techno-progressivism is strongly against gerrymandering as it distorts the democratic process and undermines the principle of fair representation. An independent, non-partisan commission would be more likely to use objective criteria and data-driven methods to redraw districts, reducing the influence of political bias and preventing gerrymandering. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Techno-progressivism supports the use of technology and evidence-based approaches to improve society. An independent, non-partisan commission would be more likely to use objective criteria and data-driven methods to redraw districts, reducing the influence of political bias. However, this answer does not address the specific issue of gerrymandering. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system

Techno-progressivism is open to innovative solutions to societal problems, and a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system could be a viable alternative to the current system. However, this answer does not specifically address the issue of gerrymandering or the need for an independent, non-partisan commission. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Techno-progressivism seeks to reduce the influence of political bias and promote evidence-based decision-making. Allowing partisan control over redistricting can lead to gerrymandering, which undermines the democratic process and is not in line with techno-progressive values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, there is no better alternative

Techno-progressivism is focused on finding innovative solutions to societal problems, so the claim that there is no better alternative to partisan control of redistricting is not in line with this ideology. Techno-progressives would argue that independent commissions or alternative redistricting methods can be developed to address the issue of gerrymandering. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency

This answer is in direct opposition to techno-progressive values, as it supports gerrymandering, which undermines the democratic process and fair representation. Techno-progressivism seeks to reduce the influence of political bias and promote evidence-based decision-making, which is not achieved through gerrymandering. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Techno-Progressivism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.